The Ethics lecture was the lecture that
made me think about the ‘real world’ journalism. Ethics, according to the
dictionary is; a complex of moral precepts held or
rules of conduct followed by an individual. Here, the word we should most focus
on is ‘individual.’ Thus, the definition of ethics is different to every
people.
The
lecture opened with different types of advertisements, billboards and many
more. Our task was to fill in a chart sorting out whether the ads are good
taste, bad taste, ethical or unethical. Through this task it was evident that
many people had a similar concept of the taste and the good and bad were quite
easily distinguished. Everyone, however, had different ideas about ethical and
unethical category. As for me, it was very hard to determine whether the ads
were ethical or unethical.
Also, it was raised during the lecture that
many people get confused between the unethical and bad taste. I thought that an
advertisement was “bad” when it didn’t have a story or meaning in it. Through
the statement, however, the fact that ethics and taste are two very distinct
concepts it didn’t necessarily mean that the ad is unethical just because it doesn’t
have any story. So, what exactly is ethics in journalism?
There are three paradigms; deontology,
consequentialism (teleology) and virtue. Deontology was the rules, principles
and duties we have to follow when producing the advertisement. Thus, it was
stated that when you follow the rules it is ethical. I, however, disagreed with
this fact. The rule stated here is the rule of general television broadcast or
company. Thus, if you don’t follow the rules it doesn’t necessarily mean the advertisement
is unethical. It might not seem ethical due to the images and might be
repulsive in some aspects, however, if the message conveyed in the ad is
reasonable, it could still be ethical. As previously stated, people have
different definition of ethics, therefore, the rule set by an individual may
not satisfy others.
Ethics, is something that is broad which
can be different to many people. It is something that can be confusing as its
borderline is very thin, however, it is something that can change the world
dramatically. Also, ethics in journalism may be restricted under some rules, however,
the message conveyed should always be considered before determining whether it
is ethical or not. We should always consider what we want to say to change the
world, not limiting ourselves to the rules given.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기